Byzantine Empire. 1,000 years of fake history added to their timeline to alter ours to cover up Christ’s thousand years reign through His people.
This is a collection of accounts designed to cover up the common era of Christ that started in Acts 2 where they had “all in common” then sent out to the “four corners of the earth”. So thst they’ve added 1000 years to the modern timelines to disguise Christs Millennium Reign of living in His people, to put us in the 2000’s, which is currently 2025.
The significance of an additional 1000 years to our timeline, was placed there to cover up the scriptural term “1000 year reign of Christ.” For satan to be released one more time to “fool the nations” one more time. Here is some information of the early accounts of Rome.
This “476 AD. To 1453 A.D. called the “Byzantine Empire” for some thousand years under another name is the questionable timeline expansion to pave over the time frame from Christ’s institution of His body of “living stones with Christ the Cheif cornerstone assembled a habitation of God in the Spirit. That the year said today to be 2025 A.D., has had some 1000 years added to the time frame only.
The crazy thing about the second account is that it puts the Byzantium era to be “refounded” in 330 AD. But the coinage was marked from the 9th century. To mean they cannot get their story straight. And at the time of this article, the information was changing as it was being requested online, demonstrating that “the prince of the power of the air” being the inner-net, an under-net and a web of capture. That “satan has desired to sift you as wheat”. Meaning the web is modifying as we go. That history is not His Story meaning Christ’s. But is under siege. It is being ransacked, plundered and pillaged, likely because they know their time is short, especially if the understanding of these accounts are correctly understood. That Satan knows his time is short. The the lies with “all lying signs and wonders” keep people wondering in the wrong directions..
But back to our point, that if we extract these embellishments from our modern timeline? That puts us fairly close to the end of Christs Millennium, His 1ooo year reign era scripture instructed us about. That the harvest time works are coming to a close or maybe closed already as evidenced by the “great falling away”. That “22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like [h]corruptible man. And “flesh and blood does not inherit the Kingdom of God.” Like a second coming,when “flesh and does not inherit the Kingdom. To mean a second coming flesh and blood Jesus is a “lying sign with wonders” of the highest order and a phrase that is not in scripture.
And just as freighting is the modern day “falling away” is happening by receiving alternate godlike empowerments by succumbing and bowing through “terms and conditions”. This is their spiral down with each new submission.. For the Gospel has not left us on our knees but having been “raised up together in Heavenly places in Christ” as something different then the 6 days of creation, and why the call into the “kingdom of God at hand” may be closing soon as “the wheat and the tares grow together.” But they cannot see us as we can see them.
Christians today believe in what they call the coming “thousand years reign of Christ” thinking He will literally come with the clouds having long hair and wearing a white robe as depicted in their pictures. When in truth, if believers can accept that they are “living stones assembled together a habitation of God in the Spirit” as scripture states, of which Christ is the head and Chief Cornerstone.” Amen!
….But Christ “only spoke to the people with parables and without a parable spake He not.” That was a parable too. Then the illusion of another physical Jesus as described above, becomes a fairytale because that is what it is. That Christ became one of us, so that we could in return, as He said “follow Me thst where I am ye may be also”. Even as He told the disciples. That “where I go you know and the way I go you know” too. And “those who have seen Me, have seen the Father.” And we were further instructed to “put on Christ”. That His believers are His body in a dying world, provided that He truly is our head and leader. And that we fo as He asked us. And thst is “go preaching and teaching that The Kingdom of God is at hand”, which is something the second coming seekers do NOT do.
So then with Christ’s body, His body of believers “built up a habitation for God in the spirit” with Christ being “the head” and the “Cheif cornerstone” and we as His livingstones, and assembly and a habitation for Hid in the Spirit” being His body, to have run our course. So that the time frame of the “thousand years reign through us as His messangers teaching this way of salvation, closes with the release of Satan to “fool the nations one more time” as writtenin the Revelation. And Satan’s release is his elevation to power as “the prince of the power of the air that works in the sons of disobedience” thst we call the inner-net.
That “Satan has desired to sift you as wheat and I pray your faith does jot fail.” And that sifting process is done with a web and a net called the inner-net that people bind themselves to through submissions by terms and conditions for temporary carnal empowerments. All the while the first commandment was “thou shall not have any gods but Me. You shall not bow down to serve them for I am God visiting the inequity of the father’s on to the third and the forth generation.”
So then for those who submit to the powers of the net? You have your god or god’s. You have your servers and empowerments to become as gods over your own affairs. And you have also been warned to “come out of her My people lest you (continue to) partake of her (Mystery Babylon, the babble of submissions to terms and conditions)) sins to be judged with her, for God has remembered her.” And just as Lot and his family were told to flee, we must recover our souls by un-subscribibg from the the internet god’s that are embedded into your souls by you subscribing to them. That :sub” means to put yourself under, and to scribe is to authorize by signature, or signing up. That Satan steals your God given powers available through the gospel to those who’ve subscribed and submitted to Christ, who through His blood and death is our crossover back to the Father. That those who have been washed in His blood, and being led out of Mysterious babbel called terms and conditions to retrieve their souls. This is the Salvation Christ performed and through Him is our empowerment and do-over to be re-imaged into His image and say to the contending powers “get behind me Satan for you are not mindfull of the things of God but of mankind.”
You have been warned.
Internet articles on an approximate 1000 cover up and time expansion hoax, to hide the Millennium reign of Christ, of Him being head over us His body of believers in a dying world. This is the gospel “once and for all (time) delivered to the saints.”
Describe identifying characteristics of the Byzantine Empire
Key Points
While the Western Roman Empire fell in 476 CE, the Eastern Roman Empire, centered on the city of Constantinople, survived and thrived.
After the Eastern Roman Empire’s much later fall in 1453 CE, western scholars began calling it the “Byzantine Empire” to emphasize its distinction from the earlier, Latin-speaking Roman Empire centered on Rome.
The “Byzantine Empire” is now the standard term used among historians to refer to the Eastern Roman Empire.
Although the Byzantine Empire had a multi-ethnic character during most of its history and preserved Romano-Hellenistic traditions, it became identified with its increasingly predominant Greek element and its own unique cultural developments.
Terms
Constantinople
Formerly Byzantium, the capital of the Byzantine Empire as established by its first emperor, Constantine the Great. (Today the city is known as Istanbul.)
The Byzantine Empire, sometimes referred to as the Eastern Roman Empire, was the continuation of the Roman Empire in the east during Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, when its capital city was Constantinople (modern-day Istanbul, originally founded as Byzantium). It survived the fragmentation and fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century CE, and continued to exist for an additional thousand years until it fell to the Ottoman Turks in 1453. During most of its existence, the empire was the most powerful economic, cultural, and military force in Europe. Both “Byzantine Empire” and “Eastern Roman Empire” are historiographical terms created after the end of the realm; its citizens continued to refer to their empire as the Roman Empire, and thought of themselves as Romans. Although the people living in the Eastern Roman Empire referred to themselves as Romans, they were distinguished by their Greek heritage, Orthodox Christianity, and their regional connections. Over time, the culture of the Eastern Roman Empire transformed. Greek replaced Latin as the language of the empire. Christianity became more important in daily life, although the culture’s pagan Roman past still exerted an influence.
Several signal events from the 4th to 6th centuries mark the period of transition during which the Roman Empire’s Greek east and Latin west divided. Constantine I (r. 324-337) reorganized the empire, made Constantinople the new capital, and legalized Christianity. Under Theodosius I (r. 379-395), Christianity became the empire’s official state religion, and other religious practices were proscribed. Finally, under the reign of Heraclius (r. 610-641), the empire’s military and administration were restructured and adopted Greek for official use instead of Latin. Thus, although the Roman state continued and Roman state traditions were maintained, modern historians distinguish Byzantium from ancient Rome insofar as it was centered on Constantinople, oriented towards Greek rather than Latin culture, and characterized by Orthodox Christianity.
Just as the Byzantine Empire represented the political continuation of the Roman Empire, Byzantine art and culture developed directly out of the art of the Roman Empire, which was itself profoundly influenced by ancient Greek art. Byzantine art never lost sight of this classical heritage. For example, the Byzantine capital, Constantinople, was adorned with a large number of classical sculptures, although they eventually became an object of some puzzlement for its inhabitants. And indeed, the art produced during the Byzantine Empire, although marked by periodic revivals of a classical aesthetic, was above all marked by the development of a new aesthetic. Thus, although the Byzantine Empire had a multi-ethnic character during most of its history, and preserved Romano-Hellenistic traditions, it became identified by its western and northern contemporaries with its increasingly predominant Greek element and its own unique cultural developments.
A map of Constantinople, the capital and founding city of the Byzantine Empire, drawn in 1422 CE by Florentine cartographer Cristoforo Buondelmonti. This is the oldest surviving map of the city and the only one that predates the Turkish conquest of the city in 1453 CE.
Nomenclature
The first use of the term “Byzantine” to label the later years of the Roman Empire was in 1557, when the German historian Hieronymus Wolf published his work, Corpus Historiæ Byzantinæ, a collection of historical sources. The term comes from “Byzantium,” the name of the city of Constantinople before it became Constantine’s capital. This older name of the city would rarely be used from this point onward except in historical or poetic contexts. However, it was not until the mid-19th century that the term came into general use in the western world; calling it the “Byzantine Empire” helped to emphasize its differences from the earlier Latin-speaking Roman Empire, centered on Rome.
The term “Byzantine” was also useful to the many western European states that also claimed to be the true successors of the Roman Empire, as it was used to delegitimize the claims of the Byzantines as true Romans. In modern times, the term “Byzantine” has also come to have a pejorative sense, used to describe things that are overly complex or arcane. “Byzantine diplomacy” has come to mean excess use of trickery and behind-the-scenes manipulation. These are all based on medieval stereotypes about the Byzantine Empire that developed as western Europeans came into contact with the Byzantines, and were perplexed by their more structured government.
No such distinction existed in the Islamic and Slavic worlds, where the empire was more straightforwardly seen as the continuation of the Roman Empire. In the Islamic world, the Roman Empire was known primarily as Rûm. The name millet-i Rûm, or “Roman nation,” was used by the Ottomans through the 20th century to refer to the former subjects of the Byzantine Empire, that is, the Orthodox Christian community within Ottoman realms.
Byzantine lies and cover-ups” refers to the long-standing, often negative, historical perception of the Eastern Roman Empire as a place defined by intrigue, deception, and extreme bureaucracy. This reputation stems from both contemporary accounts of political maneuvering and later Western interpretations that viewed the civilization as “unnecessarily complex” and “headache-inducing”.
Key aspects of this perception include:
Political Intrigue: The term “Byzantine” has become synonymous with “devious” or convoluted methods, particularly regarding how rulers, such as those in the 11th century, dealt with conspiracies, betrayals, and the brutal punishment of political rivals.
Military Stratagems: Byzantine military doctrine, as outlined in Emperor Leo VI’s Taktika, often favored diplomacy, bribery, and deception (“other means”) over direct, costly engagement.
Historical “Cover-ups”:
Architectural/Archaeological: Modern observers have noted that many Byzantine monuments in Istanbul are not heavily promoted or are sometimes destroyed, such as the destruction of ancient gardens near the Theodosian Walls for apartment construction.
Suppression of History: There is a claim that the direct, living relationship between modern Greece and the Byzantine Empire is sometimes suppressed in Greece, with an overemphasis on ancient Greece over the medieval “Roman” (Byzantine) identity.
Propaganda: The empire was adept at using rhetoric and, at times, religious polemics against neighbors (Muslims, Jews, Armenians, and Latins) to shape public opinion and political narratives.
Procopius’s Secret History: A primary source for this reputation is Procopius, who wrote a “Secret History” (Anecdota) that harshly criticized Emperor Justinian and Empress Theodora, accusing them of being deceitful and corrupt.
Despite this reputation, the “Byzantine” identity was complex, often self-identified as “Roman” (Rhomaioi) rather than by the modern, sometimes pejorative, label.
